Move open issues from old website here

[simonpoole]

There is at least one important issue that is in danger of getting lost due to the change in website: okfn/opendatacommons#3 that should be moved here, naturally it would be even better if the issue was actually addressed.

[chris48s]

Hello. Having reviewed the issues on there:

• The website is up
• We've moved it off wordpress
• The "plain language summary" link on https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/ works

So I think okfn/opendatacommons#3 is the only one that is still "current". Maybe also okfn/opendatacommons#5 ?

For issues that are about changing the legal text of the licence or the governance of how it is updated (rather than the website that hosts them), I think https://discuss.okfn.org/c/projects/opendefinition/66 is probably the right place for those discussions now. If you'd like to advance discussion of okfn/opendatacommons#3 then a thread at https://discuss.okfn.org/c/projects/opendefinition/66 referencing that original issue is probably more likely to engage the right people in the conversation. There may also already be a relevant thread there. We can keep the issue tracker here for issues about the website itself.

Thanks

/cc @StephenAbbott

[simonpoole]

The issue at hand was already discussed in https://discuss.okfn.org/t/is-odc-by-a-sharealike-licence/6417/14 It isn't the patch itself that is in question, it is just the issue of jacking up (a suitable) minor version number when applying the patch indicating that this was a big oops.

-not- holding my breath on this though.