We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem is there
if (pinRadiusDP == -1) { mPinRadiusPx = (int) TypedValue.applyDimension(TypedValue.COMPLEX_UNIT_DIP, DEFAULT_THUMB_RADIUS_DP, mRes.getDisplayMetrics()); } else { mPinRadiusPx = (int) TypedValue.applyDimension(TypedValue.COMPLEX_UNIT_DIP, ->> pinRadiusDP, mRes.getDisplayMetrics()); }
pinRadiusDP == 0..0 soo its not going to the first condition.. and setting pinRadius to 0.0 DP so pins are invisible.
FAST SOLUTION: change the dp value
if (pinRadiusDP == -1) { mPinRadiusPx = (int) TypedValue.applyDimension(TypedValue.COMPLEX_UNIT_DIP, DEFAULT_THUMB_RADIUS_DP, mRes.getDisplayMetrics()); } else { mPinRadiusPx = (int) TypedValue.applyDimension(TypedValue.COMPLEX_UNIT_DIP, -->> DEFAULT_THUMB_RADIUS_DP, mRes.getDisplayMetrics()); }
but if You will update this library to new version change the condition
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Problem is there
pinRadiusDP == 0..0
soo its not going to the first condition.. and setting pinRadius to 0.0 DP so pins are invisible.
FAST SOLUTION:
change the dp value
but if You will update this library to new version change the condition
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: