Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for AsyncAPI #167

Closed
PavlosMelissinos opened this issue Mar 15, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Add support for AsyncAPI #167

PavlosMelissinos opened this issue Mar 15, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@PavlosMelissinos
Copy link

PavlosMelissinos commented Mar 15, 2023

AsyncAPI is inspired by OpenAPI but is meant to be used for asynchronous communication.

Martian abstracts HTTP APIs, so I understand if this would be a non-goal. Still, I'd love to see some support for it.

@oliyh
Copy link
Owner

oliyh commented Mar 15, 2023

Hi,

This is interesting, thanks for mentioning it. It looks a bit orthogonal to martian in two respects:

  • different schema definition
  • different transports

I'll have a think, but my initial feeling is that this would probably be better in its own library.

@oliyh
Copy link
Owner

oliyh commented Nov 24, 2023

Hi, I am going to close this issue as I don't think there is anything that should be implemented in Martian, but thanks for your idea and introducing me to something new!

@oliyh oliyh closed this as completed Nov 24, 2023
@PavlosMelissinos
Copy link
Author

Of course! Thanks for considering it 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants