New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A question relate to the D structure #4
Comments
Hi,
What do you mean by "everything is ok"? And what do you mean by "discarding the RNN structure"? What do you have in its pace?
Best regards, Olof
…--
Phone: +46-703-969624
Web: http://mogren.one
Email: mogren@chalmers.se, olof@mogren.one
-------- Ursprungligt meddelande --------
Ämne: [olofmogren/c-rnn-gan] A question relate to the D structure (#4)
Från: zxiaomzxm <notifications@github.com>
Till: olofmogren/c-rnn-gan <c-rnn-gan@noreply.github.com>
Kopia: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Hi, I realize a rnn-gan on a sequence data rencently.
But I found the D_loss is close to zero fast and G_loss not converged for a long time when I
add a RNN in D-net.And everything is OK when I discard the rnn structure in D-net.Why that could be
happened?Or should I use the bidirectional rnn structure as your paper used?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#4
|
Thanks for your reply. |
I see. Does any of the tricks in Salismans et.al. help?
https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03498
…--
Phone: +46-703-969624
Web: http://mogren.one
Email: mogren@chalmers.se, olof@mogren.one
-------- Ursprungligt meddelande --------
Ämne: Re: [olofmogren/c-rnn-gan] A question relate to the D structure (#4)
Från: zxiaomzxm <notifications@github.com>
Till: olofmogren/c-rnn-gan <c-rnn-gan@noreply.github.com>
Kopia: Olof Mogren <olof@mogren.one>,Comment <comment@noreply.github.com>
Thanks for your reply.
"everything is ok" means the generate image looks good but the sequence seems has no temporal correlation.
"discarding the RNN structure" means I just use a vanilla fully connected net instead of vanilla rnn.
I test a bidirectional rnn ,but fails again.It seems that the generator can't deceive the discriminator and generate bad results.
--
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#4 (comment)
|
I will read this paper.Thanks |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi, I realize a rnn-gan on a sequence data rencently.
But I found the D_loss is close to zero fast and G_loss not converged for a long time when I
add a RNN in D-net.And everything is OK when I discard the rnn structure in D-net.Why that could be
happened?Or should I use the bidirectional rnn structure as your paper used?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: