Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Storage options should be optional #27

Closed
aw opened this issue Jan 28, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Storage options should be optional #27

aw opened this issue Jan 28, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@aw
Copy link
Member

aw commented Jan 28, 2017

If an appliance is built without NFS support, then it shouldn't be available as an option in the API/UI.

There should be a configuration file which defines which storage options are available, so the API/UI can present only those options.

@aw aw added the enhancement label Jan 28, 2017
@aw aw assigned aw and unassigned aw Jan 28, 2017
@aw
Copy link
Member Author

aw commented Feb 10, 2017

Added options for storage settings in 726578b

@aw aw closed this as completed Feb 10, 2017
@aw aw self-assigned this Feb 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant