[oneMKL][spblas] updated sparse::gemm routines spec, which adds supporting matrix storage layout

[baeseung-intel]

Goal:
for sparse::gemm() functionality, which is sparse matrix-dense matrix product, support dense matrix storage layout of column-major as well as row-major.

Details:
Currently, there is no parameter related to dense matrix storage layout in spares::gemm() API and assumes the dense matrices are in row-major matrix storage layout. In this PR, I propose to support below features:

• support layout of dense matrices of matrix B and C for both row-major and column-major.
• add matrix operation parameter for B matrix, so that we can handle transposed case of matrix B as well as non-transpose case.
• introduce a new enum class for layout information as oneapi::mkl::layout, which consists of row_major and col_major.

Motivation:
As I mentioned above, current sparse::gemm() API-spec doesn't have parameters for dense matrix storage layout information and and matrix operation on B, which supports only row-major layout and non-transpose operation on matrix B. So if a user needs to call sparse::gemm() with column-major layout dense matrices and/or transpose operation on matrix B, the user has to do extra works before and/or after using sparse::gemm() for their usage.

By updating this proposed sparse::gemm() API, we can support directly for such cases without requiring additional steps. Also, as part of this proposal, I propose another enum class for layout information as well.

[rscohn2]

@spencerpatty : Do you want this in 1.1?

[spencerpatty]

yes I think it is probably a good idea to put it in 1.1.

[spencerpatty]

I approve of this change.