Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistent p range between LpNormalization, LpPool and GlobalLpPool #1614

Closed
MrGeva opened this issue Nov 14, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed
Labels
operator Issues related to ONNX operators stale

Comments

@MrGeva
Copy link

MrGeva commented Nov 14, 2018

In the Operators.md the p attribute range is inconsistent between the three layers:

LpNormalization - The order of the normalization, only 1 or 2 are supported.
LpPool and GlobalLpPool - p value of the Lp norm used to pool over the input data.

Is it intentionally different or should the LpPool and GlobalLpPool p range also be [1, 2] ?

@prasanthpul prasanthpul added the operator Issues related to ONNX operators label Jul 12, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 29, 2022

Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Mar 29, 2022
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Apr 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
operator Issues related to ONNX operators stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants