Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add support for test case decorators - label, description, skip, may_fail, should_fail, expected_failures, etc. #67

Closed
onqtam opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Add support for test case decorators - label, description, skip, may_fail, should_fail, expected_failures, etc. #67

onqtam opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@onqtam
Copy link
Member

onqtam commented May 3, 2017

No description provided.

@onqtam onqtam changed the title Add support for test case decorators - tags, timeout, description, skip, skip_if, should_fail, expected_failures, etc. Add support for test case decorators - label, description, skip, may_fail, should_fail, expected_failures, etc. May 6, 2017
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2017
@onqtam
first steps towards decorators for test cases - relates #67
718c40b
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2017
@onqtam
decorators now work with test suites as well - relates #67
e6f71a0
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2017
@onqtam
added the actual helper classes (decorators) - the may/should/expecte…
0dbab40 
…d aren't integrated yet - relates #67
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2017
@onqtam
- almost done with the should_fail/may_fail/expected_failures decorators
7581966 
- added SUCCESS/FAILURE message at the end after running the tests
- FAIL/FAIL_CHECK are now counted as asserts!!!
- relates #67
- relates #9
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2017
@onqtam
finished the may/should/expected fail decorators! relates #67
61f7792
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2017
@onqtam
finished decorators - coverage should be maxed! - relates #67
39b194e
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 7, 2017
@onqtam
added an overload for operator<< of the ContextBuilder that catches b…
33d4619 
…y const ref and use a static assert - relates #23

Added option to show duration of test case execution and added a timeout(seconds) decorator - marking them as failed if they exceed it - closes #68 - closes #67
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2017
@onqtam
first steps towards decorators for test cases - relates #67
6c7369e
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2017
@onqtam
decorators now work with test suites as well - relates #67
f3905b3
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2017
@onqtam
added the actual helper classes (decorators) - the may/should/expecte…
b89eefb 
…d aren't integrated yet - relates #67
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2017
@onqtam
- almost done with the should_fail/may_fail/expected_failures decorators
754f402 
- added SUCCESS/FAILURE message at the end after running the tests
- FAIL/FAIL_CHECK are now counted as asserts!!!
- relates #67
- relates #9
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2017
@onqtam
finished the may/should/expected fail decorators! relates #67
975c6c6
onqtam added a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2017
@onqtam
finished decorators - coverage should be maxed! - relates #67
e6412e1
@onqtam onqtam closed this as completed in 68d0f1d May 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@onqtam