Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

qwik for qwind is not as fast as expected. #20

Open
ishandutta2007 opened this issue Oct 9, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

qwik for qwind is not as fast as expected. #20

ishandutta2007 opened this issue Oct 9, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@ishandutta2007
Copy link

ishandutta2007 commented Oct 9, 2023

https://qwind.pages.dev/ is as fast as my nextjs app but is nowhere close to https://qwik.builder.io/ which is very strange.
Given that qwik.builder.io uses same tailwind and qwik , qwind should be closer to it.
I guess we are missing something, we haven't fully got the performance that we came here for.

Even your other templates like https://astrowind.vercel.app/ or https://onwidget.com/ or https://tailnext.vercel.app/ are faster.

Documenting last 5 measured scores on https://pagespeed.web.dev

Page Mobile Speed Median Mobile Speed Desktop Speed Median Desktop Speed
https://qwind.pages.dev/ 83,96,95,96,96 96 100,100,100,100,100 100
https://qwind.vercel.app/ 95,95,95,95,95 95 100,100,100,100,100 100
https://qwik.builder.io/ 99,98,100,93,98 98 100,100,100,100,100 100
https://astrowind.vercel.app/ 99,100,99,100,100 100 100,100,100,100,100 100
https://tailnext.vercel.app/ 94,97,92,87,95,92,91,93,94 93 77,78,99,96,90,99,78,100,100 96
https://onwidget.com/ 90 90 98 98

I tried both https://qwind.pages.dev and https://qwind.vercel.app to ensure the issue is not with hosting.

All your astro homes are blazingly fast. As per most other people's benchmarking is concerned qwik is the quickest. I expected qwik to be faster than astro but maybe for simple single page landing page astro beats qwik.
Anyway I would suggest keep this issue open until we find out what's slowing it down, so that I can revisit it and update with my findings from time to time.

@prototypa
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ishandutta2007

Thank you very much for this report.

Qwind is certainly a bit abandoned. Qwind had 100% Page Speed ​​but after several Qwik version updates it has been lost. And perhaps it is not a problem on Qwik but of changes that Qwind needs to adapt to the new versions. There are also updates that are needed from the interface point of view, talking about the way the code is organized.

As I told you before, Qwind certainly needs an update. We'll be on it soon.

Thanks again for this. We'll be in touch.

@ishandutta2007
Copy link
Author

ishandutta2007 commented Oct 11, 2023

@prototypa Ahh great to know Qwind had a 100 too . Do you remember which version should I revert it to try for a 100, were there any breaking changes introduced for updating the version to 1.2.13 or was it just updated to keep up with latest release ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants