This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2022. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Allow the results of one function to be the input for another function #14
Labels
enhancement
Relating to a time-consuming enhancement
Comments
Closed
Here's an example of how we could solve it. What do you think about this? If we select the function in "Send to function" and click on "Go!", redirects us to the selected function page and adds the file. @romifz @jpmckinney |
@romifz @yolile @pindec @mrshll1001 What do you think? We can also discuss at the retreat. |
Any update on this issue? |
I think that we can go with the @aguilerapy suggestion: after a step ends show the next possible ones. Or, before start the first step, select all the steps you want to follow. |
I like the "Send to function" approach 👍 |
Looks good to me! Maybe it should read "Send results to function" to be totally clear |
This was referenced May 13, 2020
closed by #96 |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
So that users don't need to download and upload files between functions, to support using the tool with larger files and/or with poor connectivity.
e.g. after combining releases into a release package a user could then submit the release package to be compiled into a record package.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: