Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2022. It is now read-only.

Allow the results of one function to be the input for another function #14

Closed
duncandewhurst opened this issue Mar 18, 2019 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Relating to a time-consuming enhancement

Comments

@duncandewhurst
Copy link

So that users don't need to download and upload files between functions, to support using the tool with larger files and/or with poor connectivity.

e.g. after combining releases into a release package a user could then submit the release package to be compiled into a record package.

@jpmckinney jpmckinney changed the title Add support for passing the results of one function as the input for another function Pipeline feature: Allow the results of one function to be the input for another function Sep 18, 2019
@jpmckinney jpmckinney changed the title Pipeline feature: Allow the results of one function to be the input for another function Allow the results of one function to be the input for another function Oct 1, 2019
@aguilerapy aguilerapy self-assigned this Jan 31, 2020
@aguilerapy
Copy link
Contributor

aguilerapy commented Feb 7, 2020

Here's an example of how we could solve it.

Screenshot_2020-02-07 OCDS Toucan

What do you think about this? If we select the function in "Send to function" and click on "Go!", redirects us to the selected function page and adds the file. @romifz @jpmckinney

Captura de pantalla de 2020-02-07 00-27-25

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

@romifz @yolile @pindec @mrshll1001 What do you think? We can also discuss at the retreat.

@jpmckinney jpmckinney added this to In progress in CDS 2020-05/2021-02 May 5, 2020
@aguilerapy
Copy link
Contributor

Any update on this issue?

@yolile
Copy link
Contributor

yolile commented May 7, 2020

I think that we can go with the @aguilerapy suggestion: after a step ends show the next possible ones. Or, before start the first step, select all the steps you want to follow.

@yolile yolile moved this from In progress [6 max] to Blocked in CDS 2020-05/2021-02 May 7, 2020
@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

I like the "Send to function" approach 👍

@duncandewhurst
Copy link
Author

Looks good to me! Maybe it should read "Send results to function" to be totally clear

@aguilerapy aguilerapy moved this from Blocked to In progress [6 max] in CDS 2020-05/2021-02 May 7, 2020
@jpmckinney jpmckinney added enhancement Relating to a time-consuming enhancement and removed cleanup labels Sep 11, 2020
@yolile yolile moved this from In progress [6 max] to In review in CDS 2020-05/2021-02 Sep 15, 2020
@aguilerapy
Copy link
Contributor

closed by #96

CDS 2020-05/2021-02 automation moved this from In review to Done Sep 16, 2020
@jpmckinney jpmckinney removed this from Done in CDS 2020-05/2021-02 Dec 13, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Relating to a time-consuming enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants