You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current implementation of the rectangular zone model allows removing some windows but no walls. This would be a nice added value as the internal wall of a zone can often be lumped which reduces the number of walls to less than 4.
Secondly, when modeling large buildings, it is common to lump several physical rooms into one zone. The internal walls between the rooms need then to be modeled by using an internal wall connected at both sides to the same zone.
I'll try to propose an implementation tackle both shortcomings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current implementation of the rectangular zone model allows removing some windows but no walls. This would be a nice added value as the internal wall of a zone can often be lumped which reduces the number of walls to less than 4.
Secondly, when modeling large buildings, it is common to lump several physical rooms into one zone. The internal walls between the rooms need then to be modeled by using an internal wall connected at both sides to the same zone.
I'll try to propose an implementation tackle both shortcomings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: