Add SRResize

[Yshuo-Li]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #295 (740c4b7) into master (41968e2) will decrease coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 740c4b7 differs from pull request most recent head 25e23bf. Consider uploading reports for the commit 25e23bf to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #295      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.54%   80.47%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         162      162              
  Lines        8091     8035      -56     
  Branches     1192     1193       +1     
==========================================
- Hits         6517     6466      -51     
+ Misses       1429     1425       -4     
+ Partials      145      144       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	80.47% <100.00%> (-0.08%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
mmedit/datasets/pipelines/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
mmedit/datasets/pipelines/sr_resize.py	92.30% <100.00%> (ø)
...ackbones/encoder_decoders/pconv_encoder_decoder.py	43.47% <0.00%> (-2.36%)	⬇️
mmedit/models/base.py	82.75% <0.00%> (-2.09%)	⬇️
...ones/encoder_decoders/two_stage_encoder_decoder.py	53.84% <0.00%> (-1.16%)	⬇️
...dels/backbones/encoder_decoders/encoders/resnet.py	66.01% <0.00%> (-0.97%)	⬇️
...s/backbones/encoder_decoders/gl_encoder_decoder.py	81.48% <0.00%> (-0.67%)	⬇️
mmedit/datasets/pipelines/normalization.py	88.88% <0.00%> (-0.59%)	⬇️
mmedit/models/mattors/indexnet.py	84.37% <0.00%> (-0.48%)	⬇️
mmedit/models/mattors/base_mattor.py	84.94% <0.00%> (-0.48%)	⬇️
... and 20 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 613b260...25e23bf. Read the comment docs.

[innerlee]

It seems that the difference between this and the Resize https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmediting/blob/master/mmedit/datasets/pipelines/augmentation.py#L13 is that, here it allows specifying the "input_key", "output_key", and "backend".
So, how about enhancing the Resize instead of making a new one?

[Yshuo-Li]

It seems that the difference between this and the Resize https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmediting/blob/master/mmedit/datasets/pipelines/augmentation.py#L13 is that, here it allows specifying the "input_key", "output_key", and "backend".
So, how about enhancing the Resize instead of making a new one?

Here is resize for SR, which is different from the resize in augmentation. Can I rename it to SRResize?

[innerlee]

Conflicts with master now