Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cost-related questions #56

Closed
Alpxcx opened this issue Feb 21, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Cost-related questions #56

Alpxcx opened this issue Feb 21, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@Alpxcx
Copy link

Alpxcx commented Feb 21, 2021

Hi. I am a begining self learner in telecom. I have read relative articles and found this project interesting. However, I'm concerned about a few points.

  1. 802.11n and the future ax with 40 Mhz is difficult or impossible to achieve on ad9361/3/4 as they only allow 61.44 MSPS of sampling rate, is this correct?
  2. Will 802.11ax be fully implemented on XC7Z020? I wonder because of the FPGA size.
  3. Will 802.11ax be supported on ad9361/3/4? If I understand the specs correctly the maximun data rate is 122.88 MHz per channel which may not be enough with 1024 QAM.
    All questions are related to the estimate cost of an 802.11ax openwifi dev board.
@JiaoXianjun
Copy link
Member

Hello,

  1. 61.44Msps is enough for 40MHz channel bandwidth, because it is IQ (dual channel) sampling. If you have only single channel (ADC), indeed you will need 80Msps to handle 40MHz.

  2. 802.11ax is possible to be implemented in 7020 FPGA, if we select a tiny/minimum sub-set of the standard.

  3. 1024QAM indeed could be difficult for ad9361/3/4, but it is possible still. ad9361 signal quality is quite good. We don't know, until we try it (1024QAM).

@Alpxcx
Copy link
Author

Alpxcx commented Feb 24, 2021

Thank you! I may consider purchasing such a dev board when the major work on 802.11ax is completed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants