Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.0[fleet_work_order_cargo_schedule] Adding new module #33

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 8.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mikevhe18
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 21, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+1.08%) to 92.637% when pulling 6e9d527 on mikevhe18:8.0-fleet_work_order_cargo_schedule into 8649d77 on open-synergy:8.0.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 21, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #33 into 8.0 will increase coverage by 1.07%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              8.0      #33      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.55%   92.63%   +1.07%     
==========================================
  Files          13       14       +1     
  Lines         379      421      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits          347      390      +43     
+ Misses         32       31       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...der_cargo_schedule/models/fleet_work_order_type.py 100% <100%> (ø)
fleet_work_order_cargo/models/fleet_work_order.py 100% <ø> (+2.85%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8649d77...6e9d527. Read the comment docs.

)
start_offset = fields.Float(
string="Offset",
default=0.0,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mike ini juga related

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mas, offset ini khan memang field tambahan. Di ir.cron ga ada mas

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hooo ya ya ya ... gw yg salah

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants