Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.0.1.1.0] fleet_work_order_route_distance #36

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 24, 2017

Conversation

andhit-r
Copy link
Member

  • Compute distance using googlemaps api on fleet.work.order.type

* Compute distance using googlemaps api on fleet.work.order.type
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 24, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-4.2%) to 82.057% when pulling 74ed5e1 on 8.0.1.1.0-fleet_work_order_route_distance into 7ce608b on 8.0.

@andhit-r andhit-r merged commit 26b7dee into 8.0 Aug 24, 2017
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Aug 24, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #36 into 8.0 will decrease coverage by 4.23%.
The diff coverage is 29.41%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              8.0      #36      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.28%   82.05%   -4.24%     
==========================================
  Files          15       16       +1     
  Lines         423      457      +34     
==========================================
+ Hits          365      375      +10     
- Misses         58       82      +24
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...der_route_distance/models/fleet_work_order_type.py 29.41% <29.41%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7ce608b...74ed5e1. Read the comment docs.

@andhit-r andhit-r deleted the 8.0.1.1.0-fleet_work_order_route_distance branch August 24, 2017 13:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants