Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.39%. Comparing base (0d6e6bf) to head (0658220).
Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10176      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.56%   92.39%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files         387      387              
  Lines       18254    18329      +75     
==========================================
+ Hits        16896    16935      +39     
- Misses       1014     1047      +33     
- Partials      344      347       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mx-psi are we good to go?

@mx-psi are we good to go?

I'd like to have more context on what the use cases for this are. I think no further code changes are necessary, but I also want to know why we are doing this.

This is useful for load balancers relying on cookies for sticky session management. See https://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticloadbalancing/latest/classic/elb-sticky-sessions.html for example.

Note this is used in particular when exporting data from the collector. In my case I need this for Splunk HEC support.