Feat: Integration of Code Interpreter Feature for Enhanced Problem Solving and Coding Tasks

[A-daily]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I often find myself frustrated by open-source models due to their limitations compared to GPT-4 with code interpreter, though chat.openai.com. The code interpreter on the website takes an AI that fails with semi-simple math to a capable model that can solve a range of problems with high accuracy. It is also a great tool for programmers, as it gives active feedback so that the model can fix its errors without user input.

Describe the solution you'd like
I propose the integration of a code interpreter feature, specifically leveraging the Open Interpreter tool (https://github.com/KillianLucas/open-interpreter), into the platform. This open-source tool should bridge the gap between natural language processing and code execution. It should allow AI and users to directly run code from the platform and allow for problem-solving and visualization via Python, allowing for much more complex problem solving and coding tasks.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Open Interpreter is a great tool, and if the framework fits well with this project, then great. However, if not, I would equally be happy to see a custom code interpreter built into the platform.

Additional context
Additionally, in the future, adding the ability for it to access and control the local computer thought the interpreter would be great, as it could seamlessly help you with projects on your computer, viewing your code projects, viewing your screen using Llava, and helping through a setup.

I love this project and it is increasingly replacing my chatGPT usage, I hope that in the near future it will completely replace it, thank you for all of your hard work!

[gruckion]

This is a decent write up and I like the suggestions and references. Thank you. I am compiling together feature requests of this nature and taking inspiration from other projects to further develop the roadmap for this specific epic.

#1629 (comment)