Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transformative agreements and ESAC #15

Open
aw-bib opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Transformative agreements and ESAC #15

aw-bib opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@aw-bib
Copy link
Contributor

aw-bib commented Feb 14, 2023

To specify transformative agreements, is the ESAC registry really good enough?

E.g. searching for DEAL I only get two contracts, however, I deem there are more.

reportedBy: @pampel

@aw-bib aw-bib added the question Further information is requested label Feb 14, 2023
@patrickda
Copy link

Every central registry is just as good as the data which is entered

@ninaschoenf
Copy link

I know of five TAs (rather small onces) concluded by German institutions for 2023 that are missing in ESAC. About 50 TAs are registred in ESAC.
Its up to the consortia and individual libraries to timely register their agreements there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants