License for this repository is missing

[pathmapper]

No description provided.

[ninio]

In the package.json there is a row "license": "ISC" but I'm not sure if this is sufficient to considered it with ISC license. Any thoughs?

[nook24]

I am also interested in use this super cool map in my project.

Could you please provide license information about this repository?

---

Edit 20.02.2019
I used https://github.com/Asymmetrik/leaflet-d3#hexbins in my project now...

[pathmapper]

In the package.json there is a row "license": "ISC" but I'm not sure if this is sufficient to considered it with ISC license.

@ricki-z could you please clarify?

[ricki-z]

• @mfa
• @rashfael
• @Marwe
• @ubahnverleih
• @riedelwerk
• @orangesonappletrees
• @ddzieduch
• @robertprice
• @arouanet
• @flecno
  Can we use GPL v3?

[Marwe]

Always fine with me, though I did not contribute code, only text.

[robertprice]

No objections from me either

…

Sent from my iPhone

On 21 Feb 2019, at 15:22, Marwe ***@***.***> wrote: Always fine with me, though I did not contribute code, only text. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[michael-k]

In the package.json there is a row "license": "ISC" but I'm not sure if this is sufficient to considered it with ISC license. Any thoughs?

Why not? ISC is a valid license and mentioning it in package.json should be common enough for javascript projects.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISC_license