Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Story]: Migration of existing clusters to kserve #1975

Closed
lucferbux opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1957
Closed

[Story]: Migration of existing clusters to kserve #1975

lucferbux opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1957
Assignees
Labels
feature/model-serving Model Serving Feature kind/story A user story for larger work. Should always be referenced by a "tracker" labelled issue. priority/high Important issue that needs to be resolved asap. Releases should not have too many of these.

Comments

@lucferbux
Copy link
Contributor

Goal

Add migration logic to

Dependency issue

Itemized goals

Main goal is to have this state in migration:

  • KServe will be disabled
  • ModelMesh will be enabled

To do that:

  1. Check if there's already a dashboardConfig in the cluster
  2. Check that both kserve and modelmesh are disabled
  3. Merge a new state in which modelmesh is enabled and kserve is disabled

Aspects continued elsewhere

No response

Mocks

No mocks

@lucferbux lucferbux added priority/high Important issue that needs to be resolved asap. Releases should not have too many of these. kind/story A user story for larger work. Should always be referenced by a "tracker" labelled issue. feature/model-serving Model Serving Feature labels Oct 17, 2023
@lucferbux lucferbux linked a pull request Oct 18, 2023 that will close this issue
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature/model-serving Model Serving Feature kind/story A user story for larger work. Should always be referenced by a "tracker" labelled issue. priority/high Important issue that needs to be resolved asap. Releases should not have too many of these.
Projects
Status: Done
Archived in project
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant