You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If "Course Visibility In Catalog" is set to "none", students who have already enrolled in a course can no longer access the class.
Citations of people who've run into this here and here.
I was previously on Lilac, and students who were enrolled in closed beta testing classes could continue to access the content even after visibility was set to "none". But now it errors out in a very difficult to debug fashion (until I saw Regis saying it needs to be debugging in the browser rather than logs.)
The current workaround is to set the visibility to "about", so that it won't show up on the catalog. But this is undesirable because it will still be accessible via course About page URLs that were previously posted.
Based on the Firefox -> Inspect -> Console output, it seems like this may have something to do with MFE accessing "apps." instead of just , and that having some cross-origin conflict?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If "Course Visibility In Catalog" is set to "none", students who have already enrolled in a course can no longer access the class.
Citations of people who've run into this here and here.
I was previously on Lilac, and students who were enrolled in closed beta testing classes could continue to access the content even after visibility was set to "none". But now it errors out in a very difficult to debug fashion (until I saw Regis saying it needs to be debugging in the browser rather than logs.)
The current workaround is to set the visibility to "about", so that it won't show up on the catalog. But this is undesirable because it will still be accessible via course About page URLs that were previously posted.
Based on the Firefox -> Inspect -> Console output, it seems like this may have something to do with MFE accessing "apps." instead of just , and that having some cross-origin conflict?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: