Advertise to core contributors to take on more permissions rights & responsibilities

[antoviaque]

This issue is to follow up on a topic from the contributor meetup working group

Need:

• Taking on more responsibilities (maintainer, repos reviews)
• Dedicate more time
• Obtain more rights

Potential solutions:

• Post dedicated thread/announcement, calling for:
  • Existing core contributors: get permissions on more repos, or groups of repos
  • Call for more people to join as core contributors & maintainers
    • Remaing repos to assign: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rMwbRldYwp-xPsAG2vijqwB__9M7P2AgjDxX31G7ucA/edit?pli=1#gid=965363198
• We have an email list of core contributors - also email?
• Mention categories or repos we would like to assign: edx-platform (check list to be assigned)
  • Gather data on the repositories experiencing the longest delays in PR reviews and understand the reasons behind the delays (see ticket about OSPR monitoring)

See https://discuss.openedx.org/t/pull-requests-review-delays/10497 for the context, as well as this discussion on a sprint update

[antoviaque]

From the contributor meetup this week - the repositories looking for maintainers are listed on this page:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rMwbRldYwp-xPsAG2vijqwB__9M7P2AgjDxX31G7ucA/edit?pli=1#gid=965363198

[jalondonot]

09/01 Contributor Meetup Update:

• @e0d , @feanil, and @jmbowman will schedule a kickoff session with the Maintenance WG work scope for 2024 in mind

[antoviaque]

It was also noted that it would be preferable to have a proper list of the work that needs to be done before doing the call for contributions, to have a concrete list to offer immediately.

[antoviaque]

Working group for maintainers being created and discussed at https://discuss.openedx.org/t/maintenance-working-group-needed/12065 - this will be the group that will list what is in need of maintainers.

[antoviaque]

@sarina Wrote and sent a nice email about this to the core contributors mailing list 👍 https://groups.google.com/a/axim.org/d/msgid/core-contributors-dev/CAFtSF8y6V-4y3MqODcuSqGo6V1Z5h1PamwnVwYXUqtH%3Db2KOjw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer

[antoviaque]

Two new initiatives:

• Call for maintainers by TOC members (Régis, Nacho & me)
• Call for maintainers by the new maintenance working group

[antoviaque]

Another initiative yesterday with a meeting calling Open edX partners to focus contributions on maintenance, and work toward maintainership rights. Part of the requirements to be an Open edX partner is to contribute to the project's core contributor program, which can include maintenance of the project.

https://otter.ai/u/QyuMZ_sLsvShWD36ahfVkLGQgr8?view=summary&tab=chat

[angonz]

Hi Xavier, we are a very small community, and we need to grow to get more volunteers and opportunities to contribute. In my opinion, adding more requirements to become a partner will only set additional entrance barriers and drive off newcomers. We'd better think of incentives to encourage partners and partner candidates to engage in core contributions.

[e0d]

@angonz we do need to grow, I agree. However, this is not a new requirement. Rather we are asking partners to use the time they have committed to contribute specifically for maintenance work which benefits everyone.

[antoviaque]

+1, contributing core contributor work is an important part of what makes it a partnership - it's important to find a way to share this maintenance work. It's not too much work if we all do it together, adapted to the size of each organization - but it can be quite a lot for a single entity to carry entirely on its own, as we have seen with 2U.

Also becoming a maintainer of the project is a bit like owning a piece of it - it becomes ours, and this is important to build a strong community. It will grow the voice of the community and its influence on decisions, in the mid and long term.

That said @angonz for growth we can also create intermediary statuses, with something lighter than "partner"? This way those who are just getting their feet wet into contributing can have smaller goals and steps. And bigger commitments are reserved for top-tier later statuses, like partner.