Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Metadata about the "layers" needs a place #13

Closed
joanma747 opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Metadata about the "layers" needs a place #13

joanma747 opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 3 comments
Projects
OGC API - Maps Part 1: Core (1.0)

Comments

@joanma747
Copy link
Contributor

joanma747 commented Jun 21, 2019 •
edited

In WMS there is all this metadata for each layer:

Name
Title
Abstract
KeywordList
Style
CRS
EX_GeographicBoundingBox
BoundingBox
Dimension
Attribution
AuthorityURL
Identifier
MetadataURL
DataURL
FeatureListURL
MinScaleDenominator,
MaxScaleDenominator
queryable
cascaded
opaque
noSubsets
fixedWidth
fixedHeight

Where is this metadata in the new "model"?
We need to extent /collections/collectionId and .../coverages/coverageId
@joanma747 joanma747 changed the title Metadata about the "layers" is needs a place Metadata about the "layers" needs a place Jun 21, 2019
@pomakis
Copy link

pomakis commented Dec 9, 2019

If my understanding of the new model is correct, none of this metadata is relevant any more.

@joanma747
Copy link
Contributor Author

The necessary things has found a place somehow. We may need a final review of this when the standards is finalize.

OGC API - Maps Part 1: Core (1.0) automation moved this from In Progress to Done Mar 4, 2020
@joanma747 joanma747 mentioned this issue Apr 23, 2022
Closed
@joanma747
Copy link
Contributor Author

Discussion continues in issue #69

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
OGC API - Maps Part 1: Core (1.0)
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@joanma747 @pomakis