Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistency in documentation and UI about what conformance classes are available #15

Closed
bermud opened this issue Aug 10, 2017 · 9 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@bermud
Copy link
Contributor

bermud commented Aug 10, 2017

We need to update the index.html page and the CTL to provide information about the correct conformance classes. They are not consistent.

gpk12

And: http://cite.opengeospatial.org/te2/about/gpkg12/1.2/site/

gpk12scope

gpk12-list-classes

@bermud
Copy link
Contributor Author

bermud commented Sep 20, 2017

@dstenger, please review this test suite for consistency. We need to be sure that the index file is consistent with the user interface in terms of advertising the conformance classes. Also need to correct the name (1.0 to 1.2) and make a note that it is backwards compatible (I think).

@bermud
Copy link
Contributor Author

bermud commented Sep 27, 2017

@jyutzler @dstenger I'm still unsure about what is the scope of the test and what needs to be done. Can you please confirm and update the documentation as well as the welcome page that appears when executing the test. Thank you very much!

@dstenger
Copy link
Contributor

@dstenger
Copy link
Contributor

dstenger commented Oct 11, 2017

gpkg12-ui

@dstenger
Copy link
Contributor

@bermud @jyutzler
I uploaded a screenshot of the current status of start UI of Web Browser Interface.
Do you have any questions or comments?

@jyutzler
Copy link
Contributor

This looks okay to me. Is there a place where we can see it in action?

@dstenger
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for confirmation!

We will install it on beta environment when following bug is solved: #17

@dstenger
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request was created: #18

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants