Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[neato] Please add Vorwerk robots #4264

Closed
clown522 opened this issue Nov 21, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

[neato] Please add Vorwerk robots #4264

clown522 opened this issue Nov 21, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement An enhancement or new feature for an existing add-on

Comments

@clown522
Copy link

clown522 commented Nov 21, 2018

hi!
At first thank you for your great work!
I am not alone with this wish. Could you integrate vorwerk to your binding? It is under the hood the same mechanic. I am sure you only have to add another website to sync the robot. One nice guy has adapted your original binding some time ago to be able to sync with vorwerk. But the version is not the newest anymore V2.0. We have also made a little turorial how to use this modded binding. You can find the modded file and the tutorial here.

https://community.openhab.org/t/connecting-vorwerk-kobold-vr200-to-openhab2/32054

The modded file is here but you have to change the ending from .pdf to .jar:

https://community-openhab-org.s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/original/2X/b/bf0786743d51aea54a913c5f90224f421b6dd803.pdf

We would appreciate it if you could update the binding to support in the future also robots from vorwerk!

Pavion referenced this issue in Pavion/openhab-addons Dec 20, 2018
It's now possible to supply vendor to the binding: Neato (default) or Vorwerk.
Replaced apache.codec import with a custom hex() function to allow a clean file install

Based on:
https://github.com/scurb/NeatoBinding
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19540289/how-to-fix-the-java-security-cert-certificateexception-no-subject-alternative
https://www.mkyong.com/java/java-how-to-convert-bytes-to-hex/
@davidgraeff davidgraeff added the enhancement An enhancement or new feature for an existing add-on label Mar 18, 2019
@hmerk
Copy link
Contributor

hmerk commented Jul 24, 2021

closed due to inactivity.

@hmerk hmerk closed this as completed Jul 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement An enhancement or new feature for an existing add-on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants