Provenance....

[rossjones]

From @rossjones on November 23, 2014 19:28

... or whatever it is called.

When sending notifications we should include the source of the rule, and why it matched.

Copied from original issue: openhealthcare/ddd#27

[rossjones]

From @davidmiller on November 24, 2014 8:51

What's the use case ?

On 23 November 2014 at 19:28, Ross Jones notifications@github.com wrote:

... or whatever it is called.

When sending notifications we should include the source of the rule, and
why it matched.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
openhealthcare/ddd#27.

Love regards etc

David Miller
http://www.deadpansincerity.com
@thatdavidmiller http://twitter.com/thatdavidmiller
07854 880 883

[rossjones]

As a clinician receiving a notification
I want to see the rule, and source of the rule, that generated this alert
So that I can be slightly more confident that this isn't a mistake, or so I can double-check.

[rossjones]

From @davidmiller on November 24, 2014 9:6

Just checking :)

On 24 November 2014 at 08:52, Ross Jones notifications@github.com wrote:

As a clinician receiving a notification
I want to see the rule, and source of the rule, that generated this alert
So that I can be slightly more confident that this isn't a mistake, or so
I can double-check.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
openhealthcare/ddd#27 (comment).

Love regards etc

David Miller
http://www.deadpansincerity.com
@thatdavidmiller http://twitter.com/thatdavidmiller
07854 880 883

[michaeledwardmarks]

Consider link to local/national guideline where possible

[GabPoll]

Or link to research study page describing inclusion / exclusion criteria.

[michaeledwardmarks]

+1 - excellent thought