馃敭[RFC #0000]: #8
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
kind/feature
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
proposal
RFC
Project design proposal
[RFC #0000] OpenIMSDK proposal template
Meta
馃搰Topics
Summary
One paragraph explanation of the feature.
Definitions
Make a list of the definitions that may be useful for those reviewing. Include phrases and words that OpenIMSDK authors or other interested parties may not be familiar with.
Motivation
What it is
This provides a high level overview of the feature.
How it Works
This is the technical portion of the RFC, where you explain the design in sufficient detail.
The section should return to the examples given in the previous section, and explain more fully how the detailed proposal makes those examples work.
Migration
This section should document breaks to public API and breaks in compatibility due to this RFC's proposed changes. In addition, it should document the proposed steps that one would need to take to work through these changes. Care should be give to include all applicable personas, such as platform developers, OpenIMSDK developers, OpenIMSDK users and consumers of OpenIMSDK images.
Drawbacks
Why should we not do this?
Alternatives
Prior Art
Discuss prior art, both the good and bad.
Unresolved Questions
Spec. Changes (OPTIONAL)
Does this RFC entail any proposed changes to the core specifications or extensions? If so, please document changes here.
Examples of a spec. change might be new lifecycle flags, new
OpenIMSDK.toml
fields, new fields in the OpenIMSDKage label, etc.This section is not intended to be binding, but as discussion of an RFC unfolds, if spec changes are necessary, they should be documented here.
History
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: