Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Display transformer=distribution as node substations #29

Closed
flacombe opened this issue Oct 18, 2018 · 13 comments
Closed

Display transformer=distribution as node substations #29

flacombe opened this issue Oct 18, 2018 · 13 comments
Labels

Comments

@flacombe
Copy link
Contributor

Rural power networks implies to install minor distribution transformers on top of poles when enough place isn't available on ground or when there is not enough customers to require a powerful substation in a real building.
Is it possible ton consider power=* + transformer=distribution as a substation and display it the same way as nodes with power=substation on them please?

@russss
Copy link
Contributor

russss commented Oct 18, 2018

The wiki seems to indicate that these should be mapped as power=pole; transformer=yes - I'm not sure sure if I import the transformer tag yet but I'll look into doing so.

@flacombe
Copy link
Contributor Author

transformer=distribution is more precise than transformer=yes and it's the same meaning.

@Gazer75
Copy link
Contributor

Gazer75 commented Dec 20, 2018

This is really needed as currently only separate items like street cabinets with power=transformer will be displayed. Often tucked in between the two "legs" of a H-frame design in rural areas around here.

@pyrog
Copy link

pyrog commented Mar 7, 2019

Sometimes substations on poles are tagged power=pole + substation=minor_distribution.

So could you, please, display the following tags as substations ?

  • power=* + transformer=distribution
  • power=* + substation=minor_distribution

@Gazer75
Copy link
Contributor

Gazer75 commented Mar 7, 2019

A power pole combined with substation is a tagging mistake.
The only combination on wiki is transformer=distribution which is kind of stupid.
To make it more in line with the substation values the transformer value should be minor_distribution for these pole mounted ones.

@flacombe
Copy link
Contributor Author

flacombe commented Mar 7, 2019

It is currently a tagging mistake but it's not illogical.

A pole with a local distribution transformer is first of all a substation.
Since we map all that stuff together on the same node in OSM, the node should have
power=pole
substation=minor_distribution
transformer=distribution

There will be a proposal on that topic, but it needs time to write
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Substation_nodes_extension

@Gazer75
Copy link
Contributor

Gazer75 commented Mar 7, 2019

Sorry, but no. A pole with a transformer is nothing but that. There is often a mechanical switch to disconnect the transformer, but that is it.
Substations have busbar(s) and switches, usually combined disconnectors and circuit breakers. Even small compensators are that uncommon.

I will down vote any proposal to call a pole with a transformer for a substation.

@russss
Copy link
Contributor

russss commented Mar 7, 2019

I'd rather not have this argument in the issue comments here, but it's worth noting that the IEC vocabulary does include "pole-mounted substation". I'm not sure it's worth the effort of changing the tagging and making it more complex, though.

It's likely I will import both of these tags and render them both, as there will be overlap. Neither are imported at the moment so this will have to wait until I reimport.

@flacombe
Copy link
Contributor Author

flacombe commented Mar 7, 2019

No problem, we'll have this discussion once the proposal will have been written.

Please note that French DSOs all (160 companies) call a transformer on a pole a "substation".
This is part of the official network documentation and operational terminology.
This is even written on ground with a big "SUBSTATION" on the pole itself, there are about 150 000 of them in France.

Thank you Russss to make that global import.

@pyrog
Copy link

pyrog commented Jun 7, 2020

If you use osm2pgl to feed your database, seem possible to use Lua tag transformations to do that.

power=pole and substation=*power=substation

And new substations on poles could be rendered without reimporting the db 😎

Note : Is it possible to do that with imposm ?

Seem that default condition is OR. Don't know if we could use AND condition.
See https://imposm.org/docs/imposm3/latest/mapping.html#mapping

@pyrog
Copy link

pyrog commented Jun 7, 2020

Extract of mapping.json

         "type_mappings": {
            "points": {
               "power": [
                  "substation",
                  "sub_station"
               ],
               "construction:power": [
                  "substation",
                  "sub_station"
               ]
            },
            "polygons": {
               "power": [
                  "substation",
                  "sub_station"
               ],
               "construction:power": [
                  "substation",
                  "sub_station"
               ]
            }
         },
         "type": "geometry"

Could be possible if we map substation=*

@russss
Copy link
Contributor

russss commented Dec 16, 2020

This is done now!

@russss russss closed this as completed Dec 16, 2020
@flacombe
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is great, thank you @russss

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants