New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Display transformer=distribution as node substations #29
Comments
The wiki seems to indicate that these should be mapped as |
transformer=distribution is more precise than transformer=yes and it's the same meaning. |
This is really needed as currently only separate items like street cabinets with power=transformer will be displayed. Often tucked in between the two "legs" of a H-frame design in rural areas around here. |
Sometimes substations on poles are tagged So could you, please, display the following tags as substations ?
|
A power pole combined with substation is a tagging mistake. |
It is currently a tagging mistake but it's not illogical. A pole with a local distribution transformer is first of all a substation. There will be a proposal on that topic, but it needs time to write |
Sorry, but no. A pole with a transformer is nothing but that. There is often a mechanical switch to disconnect the transformer, but that is it. I will down vote any proposal to call a pole with a transformer for a substation. |
I'd rather not have this argument in the issue comments here, but it's worth noting that the IEC vocabulary does include "pole-mounted substation". I'm not sure it's worth the effort of changing the tagging and making it more complex, though. It's likely I will import both of these tags and render them both, as there will be overlap. Neither are imported at the moment so this will have to wait until I reimport. |
No problem, we'll have this discussion once the proposal will have been written. Please note that French DSOs all (160 companies) call a transformer on a pole a "substation". Thank you Russss to make that global import. |
And new substations on poles could be rendered without reimporting the db 😎 Note : Is it possible to do that with imposm ? Seem that default condition is OR. Don't know if we could use AND condition. |
Extract of mapping.json "type_mappings": {
"points": {
"power": [
"substation",
"sub_station"
],
"construction:power": [
"substation",
"sub_station"
]
},
"polygons": {
"power": [
"substation",
"sub_station"
],
"construction:power": [
"substation",
"sub_station"
]
}
},
"type": "geometry"
Could be possible if we map |
This is done now! |
This is great, thank you @russss |
Rural power networks implies to install minor distribution transformers on top of poles when enough place isn't available on ground or when there is not enough customers to require a powerful substation in a real building.
Is it possible ton consider power=* + transformer=distribution as a substation and display it the same way as nodes with power=substation on them please?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: