[PRE REVIEW]: Planet_LB: Lattice-Boltzmann solutions for planetary geodynamics problems

[whedon]

Submitting author: @thecraigoneill (Craig O'Neill)
Repository: https://github.com/thecraigoneill/planet_LB
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @nicoguaro
Reviewers: @brmather, @jfpa
Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

⚠️ JOSE reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode".

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/483df4a80d8cb5d9e3fd5a6d9d7fa136"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/483df4a80d8cb5d9e3fd5a6d9d7fa136/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/483df4a80d8cb5d9e3fd5a6d9d7fa136/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/483df4a80d8cb5d9e3fd5a6d9d7fa136)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @thecraigoneill. Currently, there isn't an JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@thecraigoneill if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSE and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSE reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1041

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.07 s (183.1 files/s, 44699.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           4            121             94            568
Jupyter Notebook                 5              0           1704            508
Markdown                         2             33              0             56
TeX                              1              4              0             47
YAML                             1              6              4             29
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            13            164           1802           1208
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '1981966cc44a824318e9cbaa' was
gathered on 2023/03/13.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Craig O'Neill                    6            70             14           10.26
thecraigoneill                   3           731              4           89.74

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Craig O'Neill                56           80.0          0.6               10.71
thecraigoneill              727           99.5          4.6               12.10

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/978-1-4471-7423-3 is OK
- 10.1016/j.pepi.2007.06.009 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[labarba]

@thecraigoneill – your paper has a lot of issues with references, and also the figure needs size adjustment. Please make this fixes, and when done you can run the command @whedon generate pdf alone in a comment here.

To make intermediate tests of the paper compilation, you can use https://whedon.theoj.org

[thecraigoneill]

Potential reviewer is https://github.com/brmather
Ben has published with JOSS and is familiar with the process, and this code.
C

[thecraigoneill]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[thecraigoneill]

@labarba formatting issues are fixed.

[labarba]

@nicoguaro — could you have a look at this submission, and let me know if you might be willing to edit it?
It would be your first assignment since joining the board just a few days ago, so I'll be here to help you each step of the way!
Let me know...
Title: Planet_LB: Lattice-Boltzmann solutions for planetary geodynamics problems
Repo: https://github.com/thecraigoneill/planet_LB
View article proof on GitHub

[nicoguaro]

@labarba, yes, I am willing to edit this submission.

[labarba]

@whedon assign @nicoguaro as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @nicoguaro

[nicoguaro]

@brmather, @lheagy, would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSE? It concerns a Python package for 2D geodynamics using a lattice Boltzmann approach.

[lheagy]

Thanks for reaching out! I am sorry, but I don't have time at the moment to take on this review

[brmather]

Sure, @nicoguaro I would be happy to provide a review.

[nicoguaro]

@whedon add @brmather as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @brmather is now a reviewer

[nicoguaro]

@jfpa, would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSE? It concerns a Python package for 2D geodynamics using a lattice Boltzmann approach.

[jfpa]

yes, please count me in.

[nicoguaro]

@whedon add @jfpa as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @jfpa is now a reviewer

[nicoguaro]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #205.