Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: Good Enough Practices in Scientific Computing: A Learning Module for Researchers #229

Open
editorialbot opened this issue Feb 25, 2024 · 18 comments
Assignees
Labels
Carpentries Submissions associated with The Carpentries lessons pre-review TeX

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

editorialbot commented Feb 25, 2024

Submitting author: @ewallace (Edward Wallace)
Repository: https://github.com/carpentries-lab/good-enough-practices
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1
Editor: @kyleniemeyer
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Lorena Barba

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/c4c7c68b676558abcf1c1b0092e7eac5"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/c4c7c68b676558abcf1c1b0092e7eac5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/c4c7c68b676558abcf1c1b0092e7eac5/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/c4c7c68b676558abcf1c1b0092e7eac5)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @ewallace. Currently, there isn't a JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

The AEiC suggestion for the handling editor is @JasonJWilliamsNY.

@ewallace if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.02 s (1551.8 files/s, 196274.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                        25           1044              0           2590
YAML                             9             88             51            605
TeX                              1              5              0             44
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            35           1137             51           3239
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordcount for paper.md is 1360

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@labarba
Copy link
Member

labarba commented Feb 25, 2024

@ewallace 👋
Let me start with an apology: I am the editor-in-chief and I have neglected JOSE for several months due to plain overwhelm. I have cut down on other service and am back here with intention of reviving our little alt-journal. Thank you for your submission! Given the time that has passed, do you have updates to the paper?

@labarba
Copy link
Member

labarba commented Feb 25, 2024

@editorialbot invite @JasonJWilliamsNY as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

@labarba
Copy link
Member

labarba commented Feb 25, 2024

@JasonJWilliamsNY — This lesson has already been peer reviewed and accepted at The Carpentries Lab carpentries-lab/reviews#24

@ewallace
Copy link

@labarba thank you, this is great news! I've read through the paper and don't have any immediate updates. The carpentries lab reviews covered the materials and lesson, but did not review the paper.md. So I'll look forward to editorial comments from @JasonJWilliamsNY and be ready to revise in response to those.

@JasonJWilliamsNY
Copy link

HI @labarba thanks - I won't be able to take on editorial work until after the summer

@labarba
Copy link
Member

labarba commented Mar 7, 2024

@editorialbot invite @kyleniemeyer as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

@labarba
Copy link
Member

labarba commented Mar 7, 2024

@kyleniemeyer — I've invited you to steer this JOSE submission through the fast-track publication, as it has already been through the Carpentries review. Can you help us out? (@JasonJWilliamsNY : might you kindly give Kyle a little summary of the fast-track process?)

@kyleniemeyer kyleniemeyer added the Carpentries Submissions associated with The Carpentries lessons label Mar 19, 2024
@kyleniemeyer
Copy link
Contributor

@editorialbot assign me as editor

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Assigned! @kyleniemeyer is now the editor

@kyleniemeyer
Copy link
Contributor

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@kyleniemeyer
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ewallace, the work here is just focused on the paper. I think the presence of the date field is causing the compilation to fail (just my guess, though). Could you remove that?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Carpentries Submissions associated with The Carpentries lessons pre-review TeX
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants