-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: resampy: efficient sample rate conversion in Python #125
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
👋 @arokem - many thanks for agreeing to review this. This is the main review issue - please work through the checklist as you progress and let me know if you run into any difficulties. |
👍 from me for publication. See: bmcfee/resampy#37 |
@arfon here it is: https://zenodo.org/record/192679 Thanks! |
@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.192679 as archive |
OK. 10.5281/zenodo.192679 is the archive. |
@arokem many thanks for the review here! @bmcfee - your paper is now accepted into JOSS and your DOI is http://dx.doi.org/10.21105/joss.00125 🚀 🎉 💥 |
Submitting author: @bmcfee (Brian McFee)
Repository: https://github.com/bmcfee/resampy
Version: 0.1.4
Editor: @arfon
Reviewer: @arokem
Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.192679
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer questions
Conflict of interest
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: