Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: RefManageR: Import and Manage BibTeX and BibLaTeX References in R #269

Closed
whedon opened this issue May 29, 2017 · 16 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
paused pre-review rOpenSci Submissions associated with rOpenSci

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented May 29, 2017

Submitting author: @mwmclean (Mathew McLean)
Repository: https://github.com/mwmclean/RefManageR
Version: v0.13.4
Editor: @karthik
Reviewer: @arfon

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mwmclean. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@mwmclean if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented May 29, 2017

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS. @karthik it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper 🎉

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented May 29, 2017

👋 @noamross - would this package be suitable for rOpenSci?

@noamross
Copy link

Yes, this may be eligible for rOpenSci under our reproducibility and data access categories. @mwmclean, if you are interested in joint submission, you may find more information here.

@karthik
Copy link
Contributor

karthik commented Jun 2, 2017

@arfon we are discussing this internally, will update thread shortly.

@karthik
Copy link
Contributor

karthik commented Jun 14, 2017

Have sent a request to @cboettig for a review. Will update thread soon.

@karthik
Copy link
Contributor

karthik commented Jun 14, 2017

@cboettig Please ignore this request. I see that @noamross has already pinged you at ropensci onboarding. Will place this issue into holding till the review is complete there. @noamross Please ping when that is done.

@arfon arfon added the paused label Jun 14, 2017
@mwmclean
Copy link

@noamross the DOI is 10.5281/zenodo.835547.

@noamross
Copy link

@arfon This package has been approved through ropensci onboarding and the review thread is here: ropensci/software-review#119

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jul 27, 2017

@whedon assign @arfon as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 27, 2017

OK, the editor is @arfon

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jul 27, 2017

@whedon assign @arfon as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 27, 2017

OK, the reviewer is @arfon

@whedon whedon assigned arfon and unassigned karthik Jul 27, 2017
@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jul 27, 2017

@whedon assign @karthik as editor

@whedon whedon assigned karthik and unassigned arfon Jul 27, 2017
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 27, 2017

OK, the editor is @karthik

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jul 27, 2017

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 27, 2017

OK, I've started the review over in #338. Feel free to close this issue now!

@arfon arfon closed this as completed Jul 27, 2017
@arfon arfon added the rOpenSci Submissions associated with rOpenSci label Feb 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
paused pre-review rOpenSci Submissions associated with rOpenSci
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants