Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: How scientifically popular is a species? #2909

Closed
whedon opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 10 comments
Closed

[PRE REVIEW]: How scientifically popular is a species? #2909

whedon opened this issue Dec 15, 2020 · 10 comments
Labels
pre-review query-scope Submissions of uncertain scope for JOSS R rejected TeX

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Dec 15, 2020

Submitting author: @jessicatytam (Jessica Tam)
Repository: https://github.com/jessicatytam/specieshindex
Version: v0.1.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewer: Pending
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jessicatytam. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @karthik.

@jessicatytam if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 15, 2020

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 15, 2020

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.04 s (361.3 files/s, 74179.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rmd                              2            185            334            778
R                                8             58            379            524
TeX                              2             23              0            376
Markdown                         2             67              0            236
YAML                             1             22              1             97
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            15            355            714           2011
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '648cb6098b19f10f4ca11159' was
gathered on 2020/12/15.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
jessicatytam                     2            19             19          100.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 15, 2020

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1073/pnas.0507655102 is OK
- 10.1111/tbed.12221 is OK
- 10.1111/mam.12066 is OK
- 10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9 is OK
- 10.1007/s11192-007-1859-9 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0131004 is OK
- 10.1111/mam.12038 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-017-09084-6 is OK
- 10.1139/facets-2016-0011 is OK
- 10.1017/S1367943004001799 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0189577 is OK
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02381-3 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/s11192-006-0147-4 may be a valid DOI for title: A Hirsch-type index for journals
- 10.1007/s11192-006-0146-5 may be a valid DOI for title: An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds
- 10.1038/s41467-018-07916-1 may be a valid DOI for title: Recognizing the quiet extinction of invertebrates
- 10.1111/acv.12586 may be a valid DOI for title: Drivers of taxonomic bias in conservation research: a global analysis of terrestrial mammals

INVALID DOIs

- None

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 15, 2020

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Dec 15, 2020

@whedon query scope

@whedon whedon added the query-scope Submissions of uncertain scope for JOSS label Dec 15, 2020
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 15, 2020

Submission flagged for editorial review.

@kthyng
Copy link

kthyng commented Dec 15, 2020

Hi @jessicatytam, and thanks for your submission. Since the number of lines of code of your submission is on the low end (below 1000), I have flagged it for editorial review to decide whether it is in scope or not. You should hear back from someone here next week about it.

@danielskatz
Copy link

👋 @jessicatytam - I'm sorry to say that after discussion amongst the JOSS editors, we have decided that this submission does not meet the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. Please see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#other-venues-for-reviewing-and-publishing-software-packages for other suggestions for how you might receive credit for your work.

@danielskatz
Copy link

@whedon reject

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 29, 2020

Paper rejected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pre-review query-scope Submissions of uncertain scope for JOSS R rejected TeX
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants