-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: The country converter coco - a Python package for converting country names between different classification schemes #332
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks for JOSS. @rgieseke it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper 🎉. ⭐ Important ⭐ If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As as reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all JOSS reviews 😿 To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
@rgieseke : Thanks for volunteering to review. This is the place to enter your comments, as you go through the review checklist, but you are also encouraged to open new issues in the repository of the software, if needed. |
Will do, thanks! |
The @konstantinstadler |
Thank you very much for your review! I will address the issues in the next days in the branch joss_review. |
@rgieseke |
Excellent! Thanks for adressing all issues and the detailed descriptions in the CONTRIBUTING file, this should be very helpful for potential contributors! @labarba The version number will be updated (IndEcol/country_converter#10) after finalizing the review, so this might need changing in the meta-data of this issue (don't know if it's actually used in the submission process) Another question, ist there a JOSS policy already on using Zenodo's version dois? |
@konstantinstadler A final (minor) thing: Can you update the meta-data in the Zenodo archive to include the license and maybe update the title (don't know how Zenodo generates this by default). Once the JOSS paper is out you can also add a reference back to the paper. I think there is a way to have a JSON meta-data file but I can't find the documentation for this right now, but you can always edit these when logging in to Zenodo. You might also consider adding a CITATION file or notice in the Readme on how you would like users to cite Otherwise, once you merged the review branch |
@rgieseke Great. I updated the Zenodo description. I will do the link to JOSS and the CITATION file as soon as I get a doi for coco. I will merge with master now but wait with the push to PyPI after the JOSS process is completed. |
I don't know the answers to your questions, @rgieseke — @arfon ? This submission is ready to accept, once @kaneplusplus enters here the final archive DOI for the revised software. |
@konstantinstadler I don't see changes on https://zenodo.org/record/838036 yet - can you check again? Thanks for publishing this as a re-usable tool, I'm sure it will be quite useful to many others! |
Yes, I see. I can save but I get an internal server error if I want to publish the changes (I will try again later). Anyhow, the current upload to Zenodo is just for the history (v0.4). I will re-upload as soon as I can do the cross-reference to the JOSS doi. |
Versioned DOIs are 👍 with JOSS. |
@konstantinstadler Maybe a temporary problem - I thought that depending on how you set-up the Zenodo integration you just would need to tag a new release on GitHub: https://guides.github.com/activities/citable-code/ |
@arfon In that case, it should be ready for publication with the concept doi. |
@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.838035 as archive |
OK. 10.5281/zenodo.838035 is the archive. |
Sorry, to be clear, we would like to know the explicit version of the DOI that corresponds to the work associated with this JOSS submission before proceeding. |
Makes sense to have the reviewed final version archived and referenced! Maybe the JOSS page and/or paper could still link to the concept doi as well? |
You're welcome to cite it in the paper. We're not able to make two links to two different archives of the software on the JOSS page sorry. |
Sorry for complicating the stuff with the zenodo upload and doi. I now could change the meta information in zenodo. |
I think there only needs to be v0.5 (as it was reviewed) tagged on GitHub and archived on Zenodo (and on PyPI) - did you do a manual upload or did you use the GitHub integration? If you used the integration I think you just have to tag v0.5. For the JOSS publication only the reviewed archive is relevant. (Users can then find later versions via the concept doi on Zenodo, or if you mention the concept doi in the paper or Readme.) |
Ok. You have to tag and make a release in github. I have done that, the new zenodo doi is 10.5281/zenodo.838248 |
This version is now also available in PyPI |
@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.838248 as archive |
OK. 10.5281/zenodo.838248 is the archive. |
@rgieseke - many thanks for your review here and to @labarba for editing this one ✨ @konstantinstadler - your paper is now accepted in JOSS and your DOI is http://dx.doi.org/10.21105/joss.00332 ⚡️ 🚀 💥 |
Submitting author: @konstantinstadler (Konstantin Stadler)
Repository: https://github.com/konstantinstadler/country_converter
Version: v0.4
Editor: @labarba
Reviewer: @rgieseke
Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.838248
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer questions
@rgieseke, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below (please make sure you're logged in to GitHub). The reviewer guidelines are available here: http://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines. Any questions/concerns please let @labarba know.
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: