[PRE REVIEW]: PYroMat: A Python package for thermodynamic properties

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @jranalli (Joseph Ranalli)
Repository: https://github.com/chmarti1/PYroMat
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss2022
Version: 2.2.1
Editor: @jgostick
Reviewers: @espottesmith, @fwitte
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42d6ea5759b5467dad54709db33ea03d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42d6ea5759b5467dad54709db33ea03d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42d6ea5759b5467dad54709db33ea03d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/42d6ea5759b5467dad54709db33ea03d)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jranalli. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@jranalli if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:

No paper file path

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.29 s (172.1 files/s, 72410.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          22           2511           6128           7678
HTML                            13            160              0           2804
TeX                              8            257              5            933
Markdown                         3             62              0            257
CSS                              1             25              5            150
XML                              1              2              0             35
YAML                             1              1              4             18
Bourne Shell                     1              3              1              4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            50           3021           6143          11879
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf. Paper file not found.

[kthyng]

@editorialbot set joss2022 as branch

[editorialbot]

Done! branch is now joss2022

[kthyng]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf. Paper file not found.

[kthyng]

Hi @jranalli! The paper file in your joss2022 branch needs to be needs "paper.md" for the bot to find it.

[jranalli]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[jranalli]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[jranalli]

In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission

From their area descriptions, I identified a few potential matches in no particular order: ronshnapp, mefuller, zadehsey, erasmuss, espottesmith, fwitte, mwerwee

[kthyng]

@jgostick What do you think about editing this submission? (Very different than the last request!)

[kthyng]

@editorialbot invite @jgostick as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[jgostick]

This one is my jam! I will almost certainly use this in my work.

@editorialbot assign @jgostick as editor

[jgostick]

@editorialbot assign @jgostick as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @jgostick is now the editor

[kthyng]

@jgostick Awesome! It's hard to know what is the best fit from this end of things :)

[jgostick]

@editorialbot add @espottesmith as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@espottesmith added to the reviewers list!

[jgostick]

@editorialbot add @fwitte as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@fwitte added to the reviewers list!

[jgostick]

@editorialbot begin review

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[jgostick]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #4757.