[PRE REVIEW]: SWAMPE: A Shallow-Water Atmospheric Model in Python for Exoplanets

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @kathlandgren (Ekaterina Landgren)
Repository: https://github.com/kathlandgren/SWAMPE
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.0.2
Editor: @dfm
Reviewers: @mark-hammond, @imalsky
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ef9e88a2db11cb4c962b8a1925f94306"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ef9e88a2db11cb4c962b8a1925f94306/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ef9e88a2db11cb4c962b8a1925f94306/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ef9e88a2db11cb4c962b8a1925f94306)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @kathlandgren. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@kathlandgren if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.07 s (516.4 files/s, 76446.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          15            977           1411           1458
TeX                              1             25              0            270
reStructuredText                13            115             59            178
Markdown                         2             35              0             89
Jupyter Notebook                 2              0            806             67
YAML                             3              9              8             63
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            38           1173           2292           2160
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 950

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @kathlandgren, we will use this issue to assign an editor and find reviewers.

Unfortunately, we do not have any editors in this area available to handle this right now, so I need to put this on our wait list until someone can take it on. In the meantime, any reviewer suggestions would be welcome.

Also, it looks like some of your references in the paper are missing journal names, likely due to macros that our paper-building system doesn't recognize. Can you replace those with typed-out journal names?

[kathlandgren]

Thank you, @kyleniemeyer!

Here are some reviewer suggestions:

• harpolea
• mikaem
• ali-ramadhan
• zingale
• JoshKarpel
• ysimillides

I have replaced the macros with typed-out journal names. Some references do not have associated journals (a dissertation and a technical note).

[dfm]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

I'm happy to edit this submission. Thanks all for your patience! I'll start looking for reviewers shortly.

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @dfm is now the editor

[dfm]

@editorialbot add @mark-hammond as reviewer

🎉 Thanks @mark-hammond for agreeing to review this submission!! I'll get the review started as soon as we have a second reviewer lined up.

[editorialbot]

@mark-hammond added to the reviewers list!

[dfm]

@editorialbot add @imalsky as reviewer

🎉 Thanks @imalsky for agreeing to review this submission! I'll get the main review started in a new thread and have lots more information about the process over there.

[editorialbot]

@imalsky added to the reviewers list!

[dfm]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #4872.