[PRE REVIEW]: OpenSkill: A faster asymmetric multi-team, multiplayer rating system

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @vivekjoshy (Vivek Joshy)
Repository: https://github.com/OpenDebates/openskill.py
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: v5.0.0
Editor: @vissarion
Reviewers: @Naeemkh, @matt-graham
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c9c34dc845852b43e0884cf107cfcf84"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c9c34dc845852b43e0884cf107cfcf84/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c9c34dc845852b43e0884cf107cfcf84/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c9c34dc845852b43e0884cf107cfcf84)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @vivekjoshy. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@vivekjoshy if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107828 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.17 s (470.1 files/s, 82579.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          27           1698           1631           6305
JSON                             7              0              0            624
Markdown                         9            122              0            337
reStructuredText                19           1050           1061            336
YAML                             6             16             10            207
TOML                             1              8              0            114
TeX                              2              1              0             61
INI                              1              5              0             55
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
CSS                              1              0              0              4
SVG                              3              0              0              3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            78           2912           2710           8081
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 356

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[vivekjoshy]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[vivekjoshy]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[vivekjoshy]

@editorialbot generate preprint

[editorialbot]

📄 Preprint file created: Find it here in the Artifacts list 📄

[vivekjoshy]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107828 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[vivekjoshy]

Some potential reviewers:

• matt-graham
• dufourc1
• gvieralopez
• Naeemkh
• olgadoronina

Couldn't find any reviewers that mentioned expertise in Ranking Systems like Plackett-Luce, Bradley-Terry or Glicko.

[abhishektiwari]

@vivekjoshy I will love to review this paper, although I can only take it to my TODO in 1st week of September.

[arfon]

@vivekjoshy – thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[gkthiruvathukal]

@vivekjoshy
Thank you for your submission to JOSS. We are currently facing a backlog of submissions in this track. Can you please follow up by looking at the list of editors to help me identify an editor that closely matches the topic of your submission? When you reach this page, please scroll down to Topic Editors. Please note that I am not asking you to suggest reviewers at this stage. Please simply list the GitHub IDs of prospective topic editors without using the @. Please reply to this thread by listing up to three GitHub IDs only (one per line).

Once I have this information, I can move the submission out of waitlist status.

[vivekjoshy]

@gkthiruvathukal

Here are the Topic Editors I suggest:

• jbytecode
• vissarion
• crsl4

[arfon]

@editorialbot invite @vissarion as editor

👋 @vissarion – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[vissarion]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @vissarion is now the editor

[vissarion]

Hi, @matt-graham @dufourc1 @gvieralopez @Naeemkh @olgadoronina would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[Naeemkh]

Hi @vissarion, I will be happy to review the package. Thank you.

[matt-graham]

Hi @vissarion. I'm happy to review this submission.

[vissarion]

@editorialbot add @Naeemkh as reivewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[vissarion]

@editorialbot add @Naeemkh as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Naeemkh added to the reviewers list!

[vissarion]

@editorialbot add @matt-graham as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@matt-graham added to the reviewers list!

[vissarion]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5901.