New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: A new standard for drug repurposing by collaborative filtering: stanscofi and benchscofi #5870
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
@editorialbot check references |
Potential reviewers: |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
@clreda thanks for this submission. Can you clarify what this JOSS submission involves in therms of code reviewed. Am I correct in saying that it involves the joint software contained in the following 2 repositories: The former is listed here as the core repository for the paper etc and the The latter is for
|
@editorialbot invite @jmschrei as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Thanks for managing the reviewing process! Yes, the submission involves both stanscofi and benchscofi repositories. The joint code allows to benchmark several drug repurposing approaches on several datasets, whereas automating as much as possible the model training and validation procedures. The reason why the code is split into two repositories is to increase modularity and usability of the code, as stanscofi and benchscofi serve different purposes. stanscofi is targeted at the automation of the drug repurposing pipeline for model training and testing, whereas benchscofi only aims at providing implementations of the state-of-the-art, and relies on the stanscofi module. Please let me know if the paragraph above answers your concerns. |
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman unfortunately, I need a break from managing submissions as I'm going on the faculty job market this cycle. I should be more free in a month. |
@lpantano do you think you could help edit this one? |
@editorialbot invite @lpantano as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
Hi, sorry, I am in a family leave in Spain due to an emergency. Better for other to take it since I don't know how my next month looks like. |
@editorialbot invite @Nikoleta-v3 as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@Nikoleta-v3 this may be somewhat outside of your core area but since you also work on data science I thought you may be able to help. |
Sure! |
@editorialbot assign me as editor |
Assigned! @Nikoleta-v3 is now the editor |
Thank you for the suggestions! I will start inviting potential reviewers tomorrow. |
👋🏻 @singhkakan @darinddv @struckma @jaybee84 would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "A new standard for drug repurposing by collaborative filtering: stanscofi and benchscofi". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue 🆙 Please let me know if you're available 😄 Thank you! |
@Nikoleta-v3 I would be happy to review this. Thanks for inviting me. |
Thank you! 🙏🏻 |
@editorialbot add @jaybee84 as reviewer |
@jaybee84 added to the reviewers list! |
@Nikoleta-v3 I am familiar with CADD and Cheminformatics domains and open to review to this submission. |
Amazing 🙌🏻 thank you! |
@editorialbot add @abhishektiwari as reviewer |
@abhishektiwari added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #5973. |
Submitting author: @clreda (Clémence Réda)
Repository: https://github.com/RECeSS-EU-Project/stanscofi/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v2.0.0
Editor: @Nikoleta-v3
Reviewers: @jaybee84, @abhishektiwari
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @clreda. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@clreda if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: