[PRE REVIEW]: PythonicDISORT: A Python reimplementation of the Discrete Ordinate Radiative Transfer package DISORT

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @dhjx1996 (Jia Xu Dion Ho)
Repository: https://github.com/LDEO-CREW/Pythonic-DISORT
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.4.2
Editor: @phibeck
Reviewers: @arjunsavel, @simonrp84, @pscicluna
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ec19f2796dac7303ea3bd476455b641f"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ec19f2796dac7303ea3bd476455b641f/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ec19f2796dac7303ea3bd476455b641f/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ec19f2796dac7303ea3bd476455b641f)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @dhjx1996. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@dhjx1996 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.95 s (67.4 files/s, 46556.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fortran 77                       8           2738           8727           8640
Jupyter Notebook                24              0          11827           5269
Python                          14            517            657           2423
Fortran 90                       1            508            128           2043
Markdown                         5             76              0            287
YAML                             4             12             22            117
TeX                              1              5              0             73
TOML                             1              3              0             31
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
reStructuredText                 2             11             18             13
make                             2              7              8             12
Bourne Shell                     1              1              6              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            64           3886          21394          18940
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 873

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[dhjx1996]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[dhjx1996]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @dhjx1996, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[dhjx1996]

Suggested reviewers: arjunsavel, Peter Scicluna, simonrp84 because Radiative Transfer is in their topic area.

[phibeck]

Hi @kyleniemeyer I can take this one

[phibeck]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @phibeck is now the editor

[phibeck]

@dhjx1996 thanks for the suggestions! I'll be looking for reviewers next.

[phibeck]

👋 @arjunsavel, @pscicluna & @simonrp84, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[arjunsavel]

@phibeck happy to review this!

[simonrp84]

@phibeck In principle yes I'd be happy to review, but I'm travelling a lot for work in the next 2 weeks so I hope it'd be OK if I get a review done in late March...

[pscicluna]

@phibeck Looks like I'm a little late to the party - similarly, I could do it in principle, but my time is quite limited in the near future.

[phibeck]

@pscicluna not at all late - more reviewers are always welcome! @arjunsavel and @simonrp84, thank you all for agreeing to review! And thank you for letting me know your time constraints, that's not a problem.

[phibeck]

@editorialbot add @arjunsavel as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@arjunsavel added to the reviewers list!

[phibeck]

@editorialbot add @simonrp84 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@simonrp84 added to the reviewers list!

[phibeck]

@editorialbot add @pscicluna as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@pscicluna added to the reviewers list!

[phibeck]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6442.