[PRE REVIEW]: PourPy - A python package to generate potential-pH diagrams

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @mohitpundir (Mohit Pundir)
Repository: https://gitlab.com/cmbm-ethz/pourbaix-diagrams
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @rkurchin
Reviewers: @yaomz16, @sudarshanv01
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70f75ac2c37f013f8edaa35774759183"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70f75ac2c37f013f8edaa35774759183/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70f75ac2c37f013f8edaa35774759183/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/70f75ac2c37f013f8edaa35774759183)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mohitpundir. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mohitpundir if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.04 s (974.4 files/s, 256211.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                              1              1              1           4248
Python                          19            456            525           1489
Jupyter Notebook                10              0           2798            568
Markdown                         2             32              0            116
TeX                              1              9              0             61
TOML                             1             12              1             33
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
reStructuredText                 3             21             26             15
YAML                             1             25             16             10
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            40            568           3375           6575
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    70	Mohit Pundir
    49	Furcas  Fabio
     9	Anja Korber
     4	Mohit pundir
     3	Fabio

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1462

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[rkurchin]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

🤚 I can take this one!

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @rkurchin is now the editor

[rkurchin]

👋 @mdmurbach and/or @mwerwee, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[rkurchin]

@editorialbot add @yaomz16 as reviewer

(invited outside of GitHub through a personal connection)

[editorialbot]

@yaomz16 added to the reviewers list!

[rkurchin]

👋 @lscalfi and/or @sudarshanv01, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[sudarshanv01]

Sorry about the late reply, I would be happy to!

[lscalfi]

Hi, sorry but I won't have enough time for this review

[rkurchin]

@editorialbot @sudarshanv01 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[rkurchin]

@editorialbot add @sudarshanv01 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@sudarshanv01 added to the reviewers list!

[rkurchin]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6536.