[PRE REVIEW]: DeepBench: A simulation package for physical benchmarking data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @voetberg (M. Voetberg)
Repository: https://github.com/deepskies/DeepBench/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.2.2
Editor: @plaplant
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/300762982613649881f8b6a08dabd33e"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/300762982613649881f8b6a08dabd33e/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/300762982613649881f8b6a08dabd33e/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/300762982613649881f8b6a08dabd33e)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @voetberg. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@voetberg if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.21 s (306.2 files/s, 394754.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                             5           8339             10          68069
Python                          31            773            750           2221
TeX                              1             46              0            620
Markdown                         4             94              0            274
Jupyter Notebook                 4              0            701            176
YAML                             9             22             10            176
reStructuredText                 7             43             49             41
TOML                             1              3              0             29
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            64           9332           1528          71641
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   110	voetberg
    81	beckynevin
    59	Ashia Lewis
    56	Brian Nord
    17	AeRabelais
    17	Omari Paul
     3	Kevin Pedro
     3	Omari
     3	Tristan Schefke
     1	anandijain

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1709

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: Apache License 2.0 (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.48550/arXiv.1510.05494 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f is OK
- 10.1016/j.dark.2018.11.002 is OK
- 10.1214/08-aoas222 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22095.x is OK
- 10.1109/MSP.2012.2211477 is OK
- 10.1142/S0217751X05025917 is OK
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/02/030 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1809.01691 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.1088/0004-637X/715/1/104 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.2012.12392 is OK
- 10.1086/190860 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/102 is OK
- 10.1086/309179 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201832797 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02854 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.0912.0360 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14950.x is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1407.7676 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1407.7676 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1409.0575 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stab1286 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stu2058 is OK
- 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106910 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x is OK
- 10.1038/nature03597 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/abf7ba is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9d82 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stu1536 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stt1458 is OK
- 10.1086/301513 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY DATA RELEASE
- No DOI given, and none found for title: CAMB.Info
- 10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 may be a valid DOI for title: Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
- No DOI given, and none found for title: CIFAR-10 (Canadian Institute for Advanced Research...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The Mnist Database of Handwritten Digits
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Bayesian Model Comparison for Simulation-Based Inf...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Dee...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: SOXS: Simulated Observations of X-ray Sources — SO...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Welcome to Pixell’s Documentation! — Pixell 0.19.2...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Visual Question Answering: A Survey of Methods and...

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[arfon]

@voetberg – thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[voetberg]

@arfon Thanks for the heads up, we will be patiently waiting. Best of luck with the backlog!

[arfon]

@editorialbot invite @plaplant as editor

👋 @plaplant – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[plaplant]

@arfon yes, I can edit this submission.

[plaplant]

@editorialbot assign @plaplant as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @plaplant is now the editor

[plaplant]

@voetberg thank you for your submission and your patience waiting for the review to begin. Now that I have been assigned as editor, I will begin the process of looking for qualified reviewers. If you know of people who might be able to review, and comply with the JOSS Conflict of Interest policy, please feel free to suggest them. I will begin the process of looking for reviewers on my end, and we can begin the review when we've found two qualified reviewers. Please let me know if you have any questions!

[bnord]

Perhaps, some of the contributors to this repo would be available/interested?

[bnord]

Erik Tollerud?
John Wu?

[crvernon]

@plaplant just checking in to see if you can find some reviewers for this thread? Thanks!