-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: CLIMLAB: a Python toolkit for interactive, process-oriented climate modeling #659
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks. @Chilipp, it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper 🎉. ⭐ Important ⭐ If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews 😿 To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
|
👋 Thanks @Chilipp and @dhhagan for being willing to review. There is a checklist above for each of you as you go through the review process. It works through general checks, installation, functionality and the quality of the paper. Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can be of assistance in the review process! |
@lheagy and @brian-rose: I apologize for the delay that is caused by the EGU. I expect to have it done at latest by Tuesday evening. |
Done so far.
@lheagy: If those 2 points are solved, the paper should be accepted |
Thanks @Chilipp for the help with the references and the Python 3 update. I merged the PR. Will add some community guidelines next. |
Thanks @Chilipp and @brian-rose! |
The documentation now includes a new page (http://climlab.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html) with explicit guidelines for
There is also a new open github issue where I'm inviting people to self-report their usage of CLIMLAB. I hope to collect references and links and make these available as additional resources for new users. |
Thanks @brian-rose! That is fine with me. However, apparently you wrote the CONTRIBUTING in markdown, which doesn't render well in your docs. I'd recommend to fix this. |
@Chilipp thanks for finding that. I fixed up the formatting of the new page and got rid of the errant bit of markdown. |
Hey @brian-rose I suggested adding more clear instructions on running the tests, otherwise this paper is good to go! |
Thanks @dhhagan and @Chilipp for a speedy and thorough review! @brian-rose: please keep us updated on your progress on brian-rose/climlab#69 - we can proceed with publishing once addressed |
As noted in https://github.com/brian-rose/climlab/issues/69, there is now a new section in the docs on Building and Testing CLIMLAB with explicit instructions. |
Thanks @brian-rose, @dhhagan, would you mind taking one last look and closing brian-rose/climlab#69 if it has been addressed? |
Should be good-to-go! |
@arfon, this submission is ready to be published. Congratulations @brian-rose! Many thanks @Chilipp and @dhhagan for your work on this review! |
Thanks all. |
@brian-rose - At this point could you make an archive of the reviewed software in Zenodo/figshare/other service and update this thread with the DOI of the archive? I can then move forward with accepting the submission. |
I just released climlab v0.6.5 including the updated documentation. It is archived on Zenodo under doi:10.5281/zenodo.1226360 (direct link) |
@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.1226360 as archive |
OK. 10.5281/zenodo.1226360 is the archive. |
@Chilipp, @dhhagan - many thanks for your reviews here and to @lheagy for editing this submission ✨ @brian-rose - your paper is now accepted into JOSS and your DOI is https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00659 ⚡ 🚀 💥 |
🎉🎉🎉 Congratulations on your paper acceptance! 🎉🎉🎉 If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippet:
This is how it will look in your documentation: We need your help! Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
|
Great news, thanks @arfon. |
Submitting author: @brian-rose (Brian Rose)
Repository: https://github.com/brian-rose/climlab/
Version: v0.6.4
Editor: @lheagy
Reviewer: @Chilipp, @dhhagan
Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.1226360
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@Chilipp & @dhhagan, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines. Any questions/concerns please let @lheagy know.
Review checklist for @Chilipp
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Review checklist for @dhhagan
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: