[PRE REVIEW]: AIgarMIC: a Python package for automated interpretation of agar dilution minimum inhibitory concentration testing

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @agerada (Alessandro Gerada)
Repository: https://github.com/agerada/AIgarMIC
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @ppxasjsm
Reviewers: @gchure
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f8a8b53b63b01930260bfeb2d3b60d48"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f8a8b53b63b01930260bfeb2d3b60d48/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f8a8b53b63b01930260bfeb2d3b60d48/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/f8a8b53b63b01930260bfeb2d3b60d48)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @agerada. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@agerada if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (1316.4 files/s, 123553.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          24            448            508           1951
reStructuredText                 9            174            110            263
YAML                             3              6             21            165
Markdown                         2             36              0             80
TeX                              1              4              0             76
TOML                             1              6              0             39
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            42            686            647           2609
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    83	Alessandro Gerada
    28	agerada
     2	Gerada

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00142.x is OK
- 10.1128/spectrum.04209-23 is OK
- 10.17638/DATACAT.LIVERPOOL.AC.UK/2631 is OK
- 10.2144/000112257 is OK
- 10.1038/nprot.2007.521 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 624

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@agerada Dear author, thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on this track and here to help process the initial steps. Before we proceed, please can you have a look at the following points:

• Your project appears to lack contributing guidelines at the moment. Please work to add these and to mention/link to them in your README. You could for instance create a CONTRIBUTING.md file (see here for some examples: https://contributing.md/example/).
• In your affiliations please spell out UK as United Kingdom

[agerada]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Dear editor, thank you for considering our submission. I have added contributing guidelines (using a CONTRIBUTING.md file in the root), and linked to this in the README and project documentation. Also updated UK to United Kingdom. All changes in main branch.

From the list of reviewers, I would suggest Dr Griffin Chure (gchure) and Prof Peter MacPherson (petermacp) as potential reviewers.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @ppxasjsm as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@ppxasjsm 👋 do you think you could help edit this one?

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @ppxasjsm as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[ppxasjsm]

Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Yes I can do this one (In a more speedy fashion!)

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot assign @ppxasjsm as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @ppxasjsm is now the editor

[ppxasjsm]

Hi @agerada, I'll be the editor for your submission. It would be great if you could provide any suggestions for potential reviewers please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission. I will also have a look, but you might have a better idea.

[agerada]

Hi @ppxasjsm, many thanks for editing my submission. My suggestions for reviewers are: Dr Griffin Chure (gchure), Prof Peter MacPherson (petermacp), and Dr Ian Hunt-Isaak (ianhi).

[ppxasjsm]

Hi @gchure is there any chance you'd be available to review this submission to JOSS? Thank you for considering this.

[ppxasjsm]

Hi @ianhi, Is there any chance you would be available to review this submission to JOSS?

[gchure]

Hi @ppxasjsm and @agerada, I'm happy to review this. I'll aim for ≈ 2-3 weeks if that timeline works.

[ppxasjsm]

Thank you @gchure!

[ppxasjsm]

@editorialbot add @gchure as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@gchure added to the reviewers list!

[ppxasjsm]

Hi @petermacp, is there any chance you'd be available to review this submission?