-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: NRT: operational monitoring of satellite image time-series in python #6778
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
@editorialbot check repository |
@loicdtx Can you take a look at the error above? It seems to be stopping the automatic processes from running. |
Dear @kthyng thanks for handling this pre-review. About potential reviewersFrom the list of people that have agreed to review I have identified two potential good fit:
And another not in the list:
Regarding the errorI double checked everything (repository is public and url is correct, branch name is correct, manuscript builds flawlessly using the docker image) and couldn't find the source of the issue. Could it just be bad luck? |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Build is still failing at the download/clone stage. I explored https://github.com/xuanxu/theoj/blob/main/lib/theoj/paper.rb and https://github.com/xuanxu/paper-action/blob/main/get_paper.rb but couldn't figure out anything obvious; I also don't know much ruby. Therefore still a mystery to me why that build does not succeed! |
@openjournals/dev Could you help debug this paper compilation error? Thank you! |
This is an error that's happened on a few submissions over the last few days, and it seems to be somewhat transient. |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Thanks @danielskatz we can try again in a little bit. |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
@editorialbot check repository |
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: 🟡 License found: |
@editorialbot check references |
|
Hi @loicdtx and thanks for your submission! I am looking for some specific items to make sure your submission fits our requirements at a high level (not at the more detailed review level) before moving on to finding an editor or putting this on our waitlist if no relevant editors are available. I'll comment over time as I have a chance to go through them:
In the meantime, please take a look at the comments above ⬆️ from the editorialbot to address any DOI, license, or paper issues if you're able (there may not be any), or suggest reviewers. For reviewers, please suggest 5 reviewers from the database listed above or your own (non-conflicted) extended network. Their github handles are most useful to receive but please don't use "@" to reference them since it will prematurely ping them. |
We have a backlog of submissions so I will add this to our waitlist. Thanks for your patience. |
@editorialbot assign @AdamRJensen as editor |
Assigned! @AdamRJensen is now the editor |
👋 @tobijjah, @szwiep, @alexgleith, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
I'm open to reviewing this, sure, @AdamRJensen. |
Happy to review but I won't have time until June 15th. Let me know if that works, @AdamRJensen. |
@editorialbot add @alexgleith as reviewer |
@alexgleith added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot add @szwiep as reviewer @szwiep that' perfectly fine, very happy to have you on board |
@szwiep added to the reviewers list! |
Thanks everyone, editors and reviewers; great to see that review moving so fast! |
What is the practical implementation of the review checklist? Do I create a comment and check through the items? Or does that get added to the issue up the top and I complete it there? |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #6815. |
Submitting author: @loicdtx (Loïc Dutrieux)
Repository: https://github.com/ec-jrc/nrt
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper
Version: 0.2.0
Editor: @AdamRJensen
Reviewers: @alexgleith, @szwiep
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @loicdtx. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@loicdtx if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: