New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: jstor: Import and Analyse Data from Scientific Texts #883
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks. @arfon it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper 🎉. ⭐ Important ⭐ If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews 😿 To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
|
@karthik - can you just confirm this is good to accept? It looks good to go based on ropensci/software-review#189 |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
@arfon All good to go! |
@whedon set 10.5281/zenodo.1341034 as archive |
OK. 10.5281/zenodo.1341034 is the archive. |
@tklebel - your paper is now accepted into JOSS and your DOI is https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00883 ⚡ 🚀 💥 |
🎉🎉🎉 Congratulations on your paper acceptance! 🎉🎉🎉 If you would like to include a link to your paper from your README use the following code snippets:
This is how it will look in your documentation: We need your help! Journal of Open Source Software is a community-run journal and relies upon volunteer effort. If you'd like to support us please consider doing either one (or both) of the the following:
|
Submitting author: @tklebel (Thomas Klebel)
Repository: https://github.com/ropensci/jstor
Version: v0.3.2
Editor: @karthik
Reviewer: @arfon
Archive: 10.5281/zenodo.1341034
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@arfon, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines. Any questions/concerns please let @karthik know.
✨ Please try and complete your review in the next two weeks ✨
Review checklist for @arfon
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: