Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check occurence of multiple BMZ numbers for each WDPA ID #116

Open
melvinhlwong opened this issue May 10, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Check occurence of multiple BMZ numbers for each WDPA ID #116

melvinhlwong opened this issue May 10, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
1_Must This issue has first order priority and must be solved before adressing issued of lower priority
Projects

Comments

@melvinhlwong
Copy link
Collaborator

The question: By how many follow-up phases is a protected area financed by KfW? This determines the degree of multiple treatments.

If there are some occurences only, we can simply drop these WDPAs. If there are many, we need to consider Goodman-Bacon Decomposition.

@melvinhlwong melvinhlwong created this issue from a note in IE (To do ) May 10, 2023
@melvinhlwong melvinhlwong self-assigned this May 10, 2023
@melvinhlwong melvinhlwong added the 1_Must This issue has first order priority and must be solved before adressing issued of lower priority label May 10, 2023
@melvinhlwong
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Created a file "mapme.protectedareas/analysis/analysis_00_checkdata_mulitpletreatment.R" to analyze data

@melvinhlwong
Copy link
Collaborator Author

melvinhlwong commented May 10, 2023

We have 388 WDPA IDs @Jo-Schie can you confirm this? I think this is not right. In the threat analysis you wrote that "Our current portfolio database contains 373 areas from a total of 4722 PAs in 16 partnering countries."

I got the data from
mapme.protectedareas/output/matching/model_frames/keys_wdpaid_bmz.csv

Results:

out of these we have
BMZ number: 1 2 3
Frequency of PA: 350 36 2

Thus, about 90% (350) of PAs have just one BMZ numbers. That does not sound too grave. And we can conser dropping these PAs from our analysis.

@melvinhlwong melvinhlwong moved this from To do to In progress in IE May 10, 2023
@melvinhlwong melvinhlwong moved this from In progress to Done in IE Jun 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1_Must This issue has first order priority and must be solved before adressing issued of lower priority
Projects
Status: Done
IE
Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant