how to handle feature.type and feature.namespace

[bartvde]

in OL2 we had these properties on a feature, which were set by the GML parser, what is the way to deal with this in OL3?

[bartvde]

@ahocevar do you have any ideas on this one? Could we add a metadata property on the feature which can contains all of these?

[tschaub]

My vote would be to have a metadata property on the source. This could get populated after parsing a feature collection.

[bartvde]

@tschaub does this mean we could never combine multipe featureTypes in one source? Or you don't see a use case for that?

Sent from my iPhone

On May 25, 2013, at 6:26 PM, Tim Schaub notifications@github.com wrote:

My vote would be to have a metadata property on the source. This could get populated after parsing a feature collection.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[ahocevar]

I think it would be better to create multiple layers for multiple feature
types. I agree with @tschaub.

[bartvde]

Okay, as long as we understand the implications and eventually document the restrictions, I'm fine with this

[twpayne]

@bartvde, can this be closed?