1.2.0 schemas: geography #718
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
inline the reference to https://geojson.org/schema/FeatureCollection.json in the template since we use it directly
reuses the single geography schema/definition
following the same layout as other spec generators
this seemed to be an example/sketch, and wasn't linked to from anywhere else
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Explain pull request
In #499, the Geography definition that was previously embedded in the Policy spec was lifted into the top-level Geography spec.
This PR brings that spec into the schema generation fold, using our standard generator layout, templates, etc.
Is this a breaking change
Impacted Spec
Which spec(s) will this pull request impact?
geography