Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-introduce scrapers for multiple jurisdictions #95

Open
2 of 11 tasks
jpmckinney opened this issue Oct 22, 2015 · 3 comments
Open
2 of 11 tasks

Re-introduce scrapers for multiple jurisdictions #95

jpmckinney opened this issue Oct 22, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

jpmckinney commented Oct 22, 2015

Some provinces and territories aggregate data (see the disabled *_municipalities scrapers in scrapers-ca). Depends on opencivicdata/pupa#70

  • NL
  • PE
  • NS
  • NB
  • QC scrape website (open data has no email)
  • ON has no aggregate data
  • MB
  • AB use CEO/Council Excel (one email per jurisdiction)
  • SK
  • BC via spreadsheet
  • YT
  • NT

By population, priority would be QC, AB, MB, SK, NS, NB, NL, PE, NT, YT.

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member Author

jpmckinney commented Feb 5, 2017

Actually, this may not depend of that Pupa issue. We just need scraper_ca_app to publish data for the Pupa jurisdiction that is similar to what the CSV proxy publishes for multi-jurisdiction spreadsheets.

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member Author

jpmckinney commented Feb 6, 2017

Solution may be to mainly edit views.py (see where it expects boundary_url), and have a dummy jurisdiction per province/territory.

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member Author

jpmckinney commented Feb 15, 2017

It's working for New Brunswick. Can be done for others now.

@jpmckinney jpmckinney removed their assignment Feb 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant