You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Which OpenObserve functionalities are the source of the bug?
log search, ingestion
Is this a regression?
Yes
Description
I noticed then when searching logs, the builtin timestamp key is used. It uses the epoch format, converted into human readable based on the timezone selected.
What I've noticed is the epoch time is incorrect as when converted it displays a time that is 5 hours prior. I'd like to know if there is something I should be configuring differently or if this is truly a bug. Appreciate any help you can provide.
I am using syslog for ingestion and using a docker deployment.
Please provide a link to a minimal reproduction of the bug
No response
Please provide the exception or error you saw
No response
Please provide the version you discovered this bug in (check about page for version information)
If you are passing the _timestamp field yourself then it must be in UTC timezone. Otherwise, OpenObserve will handle it correctly. Most likely you are passing the _timestamp field during ingestion which is 5 hours earlier or timezone has not been set in your case.
Which OpenObserve functionalities are the source of the bug?
log search, ingestion
Is this a regression?
Yes
Description
I noticed then when searching logs, the builtin timestamp key is used. It uses the epoch format, converted into human readable based on the timezone selected.
What I've noticed is the epoch time is incorrect as when converted it displays a time that is 5 hours prior. I'd like to know if there is something I should be configuring differently or if this is truly a bug. Appreciate any help you can provide.
I am using syslog for ingestion and using a docker deployment.
Please provide a link to a minimal reproduction of the bug
No response
Please provide the exception or error you saw
No response
Please provide the version you discovered this bug in (check about page for version information)
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: